Joey Lusk,
Also all northern countries, including Norway where I live, would easily become self-sustainable on a plant-based diet.
You can easily calculate the arable land, how much plant-based foods that can be grown and how many it can feed.
I did a calculation that a plantbased agriculture in Sweden could feed almost 80 million people: http://bloganders.blogspot.no/2013/06/kan-hela-sveriges-befolkning-leva-som.html (in Swedish)
If
we start with a completely plant-based agriculture, we will eliminate
starvation and poverty. See e.g. this article that I wrote about
Bangladesh: http://bloganders.blogspot.no/2013/04/cause-of-injustices-in-bangladesh-eg-in.html and this article [2].
You
can choose to enslave, raise and kill an innocent cow on pasture to
feed one person, or you can choose to use the same area (about at least
8000m^2 per cow) to feed 36 persons for one year [1]. Potatoes and
nutrition: http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2008nl/may/potato.htm
Learn more here: http://comfortablyunaware.com/index.php/blog/be-aware-the-myth-1/
In
a vegan just world, where everyone cares about everyone else – humans
and nonhumans, feeding all of the population will not be a problem at
all!!
Which would you choose???
1. http://www.ukagriculture.com/crops/potatoes_uk.cfm ; based on 45 ton yield for one hectar.
2. http://www.drmcdougall.com/video/expert_testimonies_oppenlander.htm
Visar inlägg med etikett sustainability. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett sustainability. Visa alla inlägg
onsdag 5 juni 2013
Great Britain, Europe and the world and sustainable vegan plantbased agriculture
Molly,
If we start with a completely plant-based agriculture, we will eliminate starvation and poverty. See e.g. this article that I wrote about Bangladesh: http://bloganders.blogspot.no/2013/04/cause-of-injustices-in-bangladesh-eg-in.html and this article [2].
You can choose to enslave, raise and kill an innocent cow on pasture to feed one person, or you can choose to use the same area (about at least 8000m^2 per cow) to feed 36 persons for one year [1]. Potatoes and nutrition: http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2008nl/may/potato.htm
Learn more here: http://comfortablyunaware.com/index.php/blog/be-aware-the-myth-1/
In a vegan just world, where everyone cares about everyone else – humans and nonhumans, feeding all of the population will not be a problem at all!!
Which would you choose???
1. http://www.ukagriculture.com/crops/potatoes_uk.cfm ; based on 45 ton yield for one hectar.
2. http://www.drmcdougall.com/video/expert_testimonies_oppenlander.htm
onsdag 10 april 2013
There is no way to eat fish sustainably; eating fish kills fish, sea lion pups and many more animals
Another
of thousands of reasons to stop eating fish (and meat, dairy, and eggs
as well because about half of all fish is used as fish meal in livestock
feed) - these starving sea lion pups - http:// animalconnectionac.wordpress.co m/2013/04/09/ unusual-mortality-event-is-decl ared-for-the-california-sea-li on/
Etiketter:
fish,
livestock,
sea lion,
sustainability,
vegan,
vegan diet
söndag 7 april 2013
Sustainability: plant agriculture vs 'grass-fed beef' [Animals with the right to live.]
"Oppenlander, however, illuminates the environmental consequences of
choosing alternative sources of animal products. This is an important,
much needed, emphasis. How many times have you heard, after all, the
comment that “I choose grass-fed beef because it’s more sustainable”?
Well, it’s not more sustainable. Especially if you compare it, as
Oppenlander does, to growing kale and quinoa–two of the healthiest foods
on the planet.
His juxtaposition of the inputs and outputs of raising a grass fed
cow on two acres of land versus growing kale and quinoa on that same
land is astounding. After two years of raising a cow on grass you’d
have 480 pounds of “edible muscle tissue. [Animals who all have the right to live.]” You’d also have produced tons
of greenhouse gasses (especially methane), used 15,000-20,000 gallons
of water, imported loads of hay for winter feeding, been left with a
carcass needing disposal, wound up with food that, eaten beyond
moderation, would cause heart disease, and very likely trampled the
soil, establishing preconditions for erosion. In a world of 7 billion
people (about to be 9 billion) crunched by diminished resources, we
cannot afford this waste.
By contrast, if you used those two acres to grow kale and quinoa,
you’d end up with–get this–30,000 pounds of nutrient-rich, delicious,
fibrous food. You’d have done this while having used very little water
(if any), produced no greenhouse gases, and been left with loads of
green manure to work back into the soil as fertilizer. We could not
only feed the world this way (with, of course, a huge diversity of
plants), but we could do so on much less land."
Learn more here:
http://www.drmcdougall.com/video/expert_testimonies_oppenlander.htm
I also highly recommend World Peace Diet by Will Tuttle and this wonderful website:
https://www.facebook.com/abolitionistapproach
choosing alternative sources of animal products. This is an important,
much needed, emphasis. How many times have you heard, after all, the
comment that “I choose grass-fed beef because it’s more sustainable”?
Well, it’s not more sustainable. Especially if you compare it, as
Oppenlander does, to growing kale and quinoa–two of the healthiest foods
on the planet.
His juxtaposition of the inputs and outputs of raising a grass fed
cow on two acres of land versus growing kale and quinoa on that same
land is astounding. After two years of raising a cow on grass you’d
have 480 pounds of “edible muscle tissue. [Animals who all have the right to live.]” You’d also have produced tons
of greenhouse gasses (especially methane), used 15,000-20,000 gallons
of water, imported loads of hay for winter feeding, been left with a
carcass needing disposal, wound up with food that, eaten beyond
moderation, would cause heart disease, and very likely trampled the
soil, establishing preconditions for erosion. In a world of 7 billion
people (about to be 9 billion) crunched by diminished resources, we
cannot afford this waste.
By contrast, if you used those two acres to grow kale and quinoa,
you’d end up with–get this–30,000 pounds of nutrient-rich, delicious,
fibrous food. You’d have done this while having used very little water
(if any), produced no greenhouse gases, and been left with loads of
green manure to work back into the soil as fertilizer. We could not
only feed the world this way (with, of course, a huge diversity of
plants), but we could do so on much less land."
Learn more here:
http://www.drmcdougall.com/video/expert_testimonies_oppenlander.htm
I also highly recommend World Peace Diet by Will Tuttle and this wonderful website:
https://www.facebook.com/abolitionistapproach
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)