Visar inlägg med etikett non-violence. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett non-violence. Visa alla inlägg

lördag 20 april 2013

Hatred, violence and judging people's character is wrong, nonviolence towards every living beings

Hello,
I appreciate that you are vegan and are doing you best to help the animals.
You wrote: "You seem to have more compassion and forgiveness for this mass murderer/profiteer than you do for fellow vegans."
That is very unfair and it is competely misrepresenting Adrienne Gates position. She has already refuted this. It is not right and not nice to accuse other persons of their intentions and to judge their heart. To judge someone's intention and the attitude of a person's heart is violence towards a person's character. You also do the same at other parts of your post. Adrienne has already picked a side, she is on the side of all living beings, she is defending their rights. She is opposed to the violence of the perpetrator, and to violence and hatred against the perpetrators of violence. That is how it should be (see the links below).
Look now, I am not judging you or your intentions. I think you are also trying your best to be a good ethical person. We are all at different stages in our journey and in our connectedness to all beings and in our inner wisdom.

One can be completely angered and outraged of the cruelty in this world without hating the persons commiting these actions. Hatred and violence (like wishing someone dead) towards a person doesn't solve anything. Violence - violence in thoughts, words and actions - is never ethical.
Hatred and violence, apart from being wrong, drains a person's energy, and doesn't contribute to making this world vegan.
I recommend you all to read this: http://bloganders.blogspot.no/2013/04/veganism-love-compassion-and-non.html
and this http://www.worldpeacediet.com/ (prayers for the animals), and this: http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/a-comment-on-violence/#.UXJRv8qwD-E

So can please everyone stop judging people's intentions; and lets just have non-judgemental disussions of love and compassion that discusses issues, instead of a discussion that is accusing people of attitudes and viewpoints and attitudes of heart, that people don't possess.
Love and peace to everyone, Anders

A.G. wrote:
Johan Agstam, the video is not anything I would agree with... the article, I felt was spot on. Thanks for posting.

@WesternVegan WinterWolf, hello, nice to meet you too. lol Since my very recently joining this group, there have been so many misunderstandings. I'm new in this group, I've introduced myself accordingly, and am genuinely happy to meet positive people, share recipes, tips, stories etc about the joys of being vegan. I'm not a troll but I'm also not at war with meat eaters, and I won't be painted into a corner simply because of misunderstandings or differences of opinion. My being a vegan is absolutely not to be called into question. You don't know what actions I take on a daily basis to help animals, nor should you judge me based on how vegan you think I am. This group says it's open to those who are curious about becoming vegan... now as for the question of whether or not I am willing to support groups who advocate things like property damage etc, I am not. I have the right not to support plugging into negative sentiments/actions. Harming property etc gets very little or absolutely nothing done imo, for people or animals. So if you feel differently, that's your right. I will not try to change you, as I know I will not be successful. Rather I will change myself, I will continue to grow, and I will share my thoughts as I feel they're applicable.
I see anger as a natural human emotion. I do think that it can be channeled and can fuel action that's positive and that is a productive thing. I'm not on any fence, I simply choose to make an impact in a different way than yourself or perhaps VeganMercy Angel Wolf, (who has shared a kind greeting and information with me about herself,) I promise you, I don't hate or loathe her, I just disagree with her viewpoint, which she invited me to do via the wording in her post... I answered honestly. I make no apology for saying I can love someone even if I disagree with them or their lifestyle. I am not interested in arguing with anyone in a group that's about something I consider very personal, which is specifically based on compassion. I promise you I don't feel anything but hackles up concerning my comments, so why would I want to stick around to 'learn' anything? One cannot learn anything but to put up a boundary if one feels attacked, so I would ask simply that you not attack me. We don't know each other. There is no need to be at odds with one another. I don't judge my community as one that is limited to vegans vs non vegans. As many here have pointed out, including VeganMercy Angel Wolf, I myself used to consume dairy, even meat occasionally- so I don't forget that. I understand because I myself was there- what patience and kindness can do as opposed to an exclusionary approach. As I mentioned, I especially would never choose to be 'violent' or 'damage property', but I am also not passive in the sense that I do nothing to help animals. So thank you for the dialog and the time spent, the information I've gathered will not be soon forgotten.

Anders Branderud, well spoken



----

Adrienne Gates My final take? We all have our own path, we all stop breathing one day... why wish harm on others? That's all l have to offer. I am not perfect, I get angry, I forgive, I love animals.....

My analogy was explained as clearly as possible, and I feel i
t's perhaps not been understood. If that's not the case, I am happy to be misunderstood, but not have my words called drivel etc. I'm tired. I need to go to bed. I can't say I understand all of the misunderstandings here anymore, there are more than one.

The analogy of shooting a dog for barking was intended to say- I would no more wish a person dead for behaving like a person, than I would wish a dog dead for behaving like a dog. I wish neither. I wish nothing and no one dead. In other words, and let me be clear- I do not wish death on others in moments of anger. I get angry yes. I do act on that anger once I've processed it and decided a correct course of action. I don't condone the video posted and that was the part about property damage etc. that I was addressing. As for not 'really' wishing anyone harm, I was clear on that as well. I said, I do not believe wishing anyone dead does anything productive. That's all. Difference of opinion. I can and do act in many tangible ways on behalf of those without a voice. Wishing anyone dead has never gotten me anywhere. So that is not my personal path. I applaud everyone here for your convictions, I just don't agree w/ you 100%. That's ok. That's part of the diversity of the movement, and hopefully our strength. We shouldn't be at each other's throats, and so as I said before, if anything I said was misunderstood I can only hope for the space to be allowed for people to actually have differences here.

Now seriously, if I'm not as clear as I could be it's because I'm really very tired and have to get up early. Please excuse me.

_____________________________
VeganMercy Angel Wolf, your post made me think of one of my favorites....

William Cullen Bryant. 1794–1878

16. Thanatopsis

TO HIM who in the love of Nature holds
Communion with her visible forms, she speaks
A various language; for his gayer hours
She has a voice of gladness, and a smile
And eloquence of beauty, and she glides 5
Into his darker musings, with a mild
And healing sympathy, that steals away
Their sharpness, ere he is aware. When thoughts
Of the last bitter hour come like a blight
Over thy spirit, and sad images 10
Of the stern agony, and shroud, and pall,
And breathless darkness, and the narrow house,
Make thee to shudder, and grow sick at heart;—
Go forth under the open sky, and list
To Nature's teachings, while from all around— 15
Earth and her waters, and the depths of air—
Comes a still voice—Yet a few days, and thee
The all-beholding sun shall see no more
In all his course; nor yet in the cold ground,
Where thy pale form was laid, with many tears, 20
Nor in the embrace of ocean, shall exist
Thy image. Earth, that nourished thee, shall claim
Thy growth, to be resolved to earth again,
And, lost each human trace, surrendering up
Thine individual being, shalt thou go 25
To mix forever with the elements;
To be a brother to the insensible rock,
And to the sluggish clod, which the rude swain
Turns with his share, and treads upon. The oak
Shall send his roots abroad, and pierce thy mould. 30
Yet not to thine eternal resting-place
Shalt thou retire alone, nor couldst thou wish
Couch more magnificent. Thou shalt lie down
With patriarchs of the infant world,—with kings,
The powerful of the earth,—the wise, the good, 35
Fair forms, and hoary seers of ages past,
All in one mighty sepulchre. The hills
Rock-ribbed and ancient as the sun; the vales
Stretching in pensive quietness between;
The venerable woods—rivers that move 40
In majesty, and the complaining brooks
That make the meadows green; and, poured round all,
Old Ocean's gray and melancholy waste,—
Are but the solemn decorations all
Of the great tomb of man! The golden sun, 45
The planets, all the infinite host of heaven,
Are shining on the sad abodes of death,
Through the still lapse of ages. All that tread
The globe are but a handful to the tribes
That slumber in its bosom.—Take the wings 50
Of morning, pierce the Barcan wilderness,
Or lose thyself in the continuous woods
Where rolls the Oregon, and hears no sound,
Save his own dashings,—yet the dead are there:
And millions in those solitudes, since first 55
The flight of years began, have laid them down
In their last sleep—the dead reign there alone.
So shalt thou rest; and what if thou withdraw
In silence from the living, and no friend
Take note of thy departure? All that breathe 60
Will share thy destiny. The gay will laugh
When thou art gone, the solemn brood of care
Plod on, and each one as before will chase
His favorite phantom; yet all these shall leave
Their mirth and their employments, and shall come 65
And make their bed with thee. As the long train
Of ages glide away, the sons of men,
The youth in life's green spring, and he who goes
In the full strength of years, matron and maid,
The speechless babe, and the gray-headed man— 70
Shall one by one be gathered to thy side
By those, who in their turn shall follow them.

So live, that when thy summons comes to join
The innumerable caravan which moves
To that mysterious realm, where each shall take 75
His chamber in the silent halls of death,
Thou go not, like the quarry-slave at night,
Scourged to his dungeon, but, sustained and soothed
By an unfaltering trust, approach thy grave
Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch 80
About him, and lies down to pleasant dreams.

tisdag 16 april 2013

Vegans against violence; veganism is nonviolence, Ahimsa

 
“Veganism is about nonviolence. First and foremost, it’s about nonviolence to other sentient beings. But it’s also about nonviolence to the earth and nonviolence to yourself.” ~ Gary L Francione

It troubles me when I see vegans calling violent retribution on those who harm animals. I fail to see how it is possible to reconcile advocating violence against one species of sentient beings (humans) while advocating nonviolence against others. Furthermore, such comments achieve nothing except to provide ammunition for those with an interest in opposing veganism and what it stands for.

"Violence is the problem; it is not any part of the solution." ~ Gary L. Francione

Quote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

måndag 1 april 2013

Veganism, jainism, Ahimsa, non-violence, dairy-industry is Himsa


My notes from a lecture (see link below) by Gary Francione at a Jain-conference:
[Garys website: http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ ]
During that time we started to hear about non-violence. Dr. King started about non-violence and Gandhi. We heard about Gandhi in history-class.. He was important in relation between Britain and India. We started hearing about him. Non-violence is a cool idea. It fits in our opposition towards the war. It was a total abstract concept for me. It was a word, a concept, it meant nothing. 

It was in 1978 that I started to understand what Ahimsa meant. Someone challenged me, you eat meat, you believe in non-violence, you should go to a slaughter-house. It was an absolutely horrifying experience. Up to that point of my life, it was the most horrifying experience that I had. .. Still when I am in periods of stress, I still have nightmares about that slaughter-house. .. I went to a veal-slaughterhouse. The way veal calves are raised. They are raised in these tiny crates. Most of them can’t walk because of this. They are dragged. According to American law you are supposed to stun them., so that they can’t feel anything… But that doesn’t work very well. You have to use electrical prod. Many cows start to get conscious when people start cutting in. I walked out there as a completely different person. I realized that violence is a part of my life. Every time when I am eating meat, I am a part of this. Then I start to thinking about what non-violence is. It started to become part of my life. I started thinking about what non-violence meant. It wasn’t just that it was bloody and horrible. It was the violence that I was responsible for. I started to study more about violence. That is when I came to Jainism. I knew nothing about Jainism. I have heard about it. I had silly stereotypes. There wasn’t at the time a great deal of literature written in English that was good. I read what I could. I encountered Ahimsa. Ahimsa is the principle. I thought it is just wonderful.

I continued to consume dairy. I didn’t know you could live a healthy life without eating dairy. At the time I bought into the propaganda that you needed to eat it to get protein, in particular if you didn’t eat meat. I told my mother in 1978 that I was becoming a vegetarian. She said you are going to die. People were calling ‘Please eat meat, you are going to die’. It was 1982. I had a conversation with a vegan friend. She said there is no difference between dairy and meat. She gave me a book, I read it, it was a Saturday in October or November in 1982. I have not eaten a dairy-product since that time. I changed my behavior, since it couldn’t be justified.
I continued to wear the leather-products I had until they wore out. I stopped buying wool, I stopped buying silk.
The book was called Fettered Kingdoms by John Bryant. I was very impressed by his book. Later I met him in London. He said I am a little embarrassed, I am not vegan anymore. He said ‘I find it too difficult’. Gary said ‘If you are finding it too hard to be vegan in Britain, you are not trying enough.’ He wrote to me: ‘I am moving to become vegan again’ Gary said: ‘ Better late then never’.
I think we have a tendency to think that it is okay to eat dairy products, because you don’t kill the animals for dairy. Meat and dairy are connected. If you are supporting dairy industry you are supporting meat industry. You got to keep impregnated the cows. The male calves become ‘veal calves’. The veal industry kills over a 1 million of veal calves in India each year, because of the dairy industry in India. They are producing all of these veal calves. You sell them for meat. Dairy cows natural life span of 30 years. We kill them after 5-6 years.
Animals used for dairy are kept alive longer. They are treated anywhere as badly.
To say that dairy doesn’t involve death is wrong as a factual matter.

It is not just a matter of killing, it Is a matter of suffering. If you look at Acaranga sutra, it is written quite clearly, ‘The Arhats and Bhagavats of the past, present, and future, all say thus, speak thus, declare thus, explain thus: all breathing, existing, living, sentient creatures should not be slain, nor treated with violence, nor abused, nor tormented, nor driven away.
I carry Acaranga sutra in that book. It is a marvelous book. I have read it enough times, so that parts are memorized. It is a marvelous books. It contains the primarily ethical principles of Jainism.
It is quite clear – it is just not killing, it is making animals suffer.  There are some animal organizations that have labels ‘certified humane’ ,etc.
Can you reduce suffering, maybe, you can a little.
If you have two slave owners, one beats his/her slave 9 times, and another 10 times.
[Criticizing “humane milk”, etc.: ] Is it himsa – violence – to use another human being? Is it alright to own another human being. The answer is No. Is it alright to beat that person once. No.
There are some organizations that telling free-range eggs are better, etc.
All is torture. Some of it may be less torture. I don’t know which is worse. It is torture in both cases .
On a conventional dairy calf- the calf is taken away directly. Organic dairy farm –calf is taken away in 5 or 6 or 7 days.
The mother gets very upset.
When they are going to take the babies, the mothers will as a group try to protect the baby.
Jainism is clear you can’t intentionally use Ahimsa. It is absolutely clear we can’t do this. It is a matter of not just killing, but also suffering. Suffering is a part of dairy. We can’t consume animal products without Himsa – violence.

Plants are alive – they have the sense of touch. Obviously we should consume as few plants as possible. We other commit suicide or we die. There is a difference. Jains recognize there is a difference between 1-sense-organism compared to a 5-sense-organism. Although I think plants are alive. Even the Jain scholars recognize there is a huge difference between a plant and a 5-sense animal. One has a mind that doesn’t exist in the 5 sense-organism. Plants don’t have a nervous system. What goes on with a plant is qualitatively difference to what goes on with an animal.  We all recognize the difference. If I cut a lettuce, compared to cutting a chicken – you would recognize there is a difference between the two.
When I ask ‘Why not vegan’. Some say ‘it is tradition’.
Jainism celebrates rationality. We [as a society] have been doing lots of bad things for a long time: racism, sexism, etc.

There were people at that time that had 50 wives. He didn’t condemn them. He said things are wrong. He didn’t condemn them.

(..) There is not a situation of necessity for survival.
Some people say ‘There is a compromise. We can’t avoid all violence.’
If that argument works then it is okay to eat meat. That argument doesn’t work. If that works then the people how said ‘I would like to eat meat’ would be justified.

[Discussing  principle of Anekantavada]: All substances are constantly in the state of changing. We cannot understand everything. It doesn’t mean that truth is relative. Truth is complex. Truth is hard to understand. We should never use violence to get people to accept our truth.
There is a story of an elephant. Some people were touching the elephant and feeling different parts. There is an elephant. That is truth. There is a truth, truth is not relative.
Ahimsa is truth. If truth is relative, there can be no dharma. ..

It shouldn’t matter if it is inconvenient. There was no shuttle at the airport. I walked up to an Indian person. He asked: Are you here for the Jain-conference. They were travelling at the train. 30 years ago soymilk was horrible. No, there are many good soymilks, great non-dairy ice-cream.  You use soy-margarine. You don’t have to use gee.  He said: ‘I can tell the difference between soy-milk and gee-milk when I drink tea. I rather have the soymilk, because I know I don’t engage in Himsa.’.  I don’t want the milk-taste badly in enough to engage in Himsa. If everything here was made without milk, you wouldn’t notice. You really wouldn’t notice. In the end, what really matters is the world principle. Can we ever justify violence with the only reason of ‘pleasure’¨.

Everyone was upset with Michael Vick because he was engaged in dog-fighting. His students said: It is terrible what he did. The dogs were fighting. Why? Michael Vick enjoyed it. Students: That wasn’t good enough. ‘Pleasure’ isn’t good enough’ He said: Are you vegan. What is your excuse? You don’t need animal products to be healthy. Animal agriculture is more responsible for global warming than all fossil fuels for transportation.

‘Pleasure’ is no different from seeing Michael Vick engaging in dog-fighting.
… It was a profound talk. He said Ahimsa is Karuna. It is I am going to positively interact with you. It is live and help live. The positive notion of Ahimsa.  I was so impressed by him. As Jains we should be in the forefront of fighting rasism, sexism , in the forefront of the ecology-movement.
I would like to add to this, we ought to be in the forefront of the animal rights-movement. We should stop bringing domesticated animals into the world. I live with 5 vegan rescue dogs. I love dogs. If they were 2 dogs left and I owned them, we would not continue to domesticate animals.
Stop interfering with the animals in the wild. The animas should not be in our glasses, not in our food.
Never do intentionally harm. Don’t steal.
Jainism prohibits stealing.

The cow does not give us the milk and the butter. We take it. We steal it from her baby.
I am not making any moral judgment about you. That is violence. I spend my life talking to omnivores, people eating fish, meat and eggs. When I am with Jains, I feel I am with family. You are 95% there people [i.e. in using non-violence]. It is only the milk, the ice-cream, the gee that you have to stop with.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx8kKHvnf4Q&list=UUe-9_Ye6RoLfXLnUXg10qLw