Hej Anna,
Fint att vi håller med varandra om det.
"Happy exploitation" är inte en lösning på något problem. Läs gärna denna artikel om problemet: http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/the-abolitionist-approach-and-farm-sanctuary-discuss-happy-meat-abolition-and-welfare-reform/
Vi
ska istället få personer att inse hur lätt det är att bli vegan. Och om
de inte tror att de kan bli veganer direkt, trots hur enkelt det är och
trots att de förstår att det är fel att döda och skada djur, så kan vi
rekommendera dem att först testa att vara vegan 1 måltid per dag, och
sedan äta flera och flera veganska måltider. Lite fler tips:
http://elated.co.za/transition-to-vegan/
Ha en fin dag!!
Visar inlägg med etikett so called happy exploitation. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett so called happy exploitation. Visa alla inlägg
tisdag 7 maj 2013
lördag 6 april 2013
Veganism is the only rational response to the recognition that animals matter morally.
The animal movement should be clear: veganism is the *only* rational
response to the recognition that animals matter morally. Animal
advocates should *never* be partnering with industry to try to make the
process of exploitation "better."
The economic reality that animals are property will always constrain and limit welfare reform to measures that, as a general matter, improve production and are rational for industry to pursue. If the movement spoke with a unified vegan voice, industry would respond with welfare reforms anyway to try to assure the public that veganism was not necessary and that animal products were produced in a "humane" way. Welfare reform will happen even if animal advocates don't campaign for it.
When animal advocates partner with industry, the message that is sent to the public is that they can be "compassionate" consumers. That is a message that industry loves. It should never be a message promoted by animal advocates. There is no such thing as "compassionate" consumption. There is veganism and there is direct participation in animal exploitation. There is no third choice.
The economic reality that animals are property will always constrain and limit welfare reform to measures that, as a general matter, improve production and are rational for industry to pursue. If the movement spoke with a unified vegan voice, industry would respond with welfare reforms anyway to try to assure the public that veganism was not necessary and that animal products were produced in a "humane" way. Welfare reform will happen even if animal advocates don't campaign for it.
When animal advocates partner with industry, the message that is sent to the public is that they can be "compassionate" consumers. That is a message that industry loves. It should never be a message promoted by animal advocates. There is no such thing as "compassionate" consumption. There is veganism and there is direct participation in animal exploitation. There is no third choice.
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)