Människorättsorganisationer - "hjälpa" genom att ge getter eller annan vegansk hjälp?

Ja, en människorättsorganisation förvärrar för både människor och utnyttjar djur genom att ge hjälp som består av att utnyttja djur istället för att utbilda den lokala befolkningen om hur man driver vegansk permakultur. Jag pratade nyligen med Unicef - jag mötte de på gatan - och tog tillfället att prata om detta och om veganism. De borde hjälpa människor att bli självförsörjande genom att utbilda om hur man bedriver vegansk permakultur [Mer om detta: http://bloganders.blogspot.no/2014/04/vision-for-nonviolent-vegan.html ]

Jag skrev en artikel om detta:

 I steadily encounter human right organizations that want to help humans by efforts that are harming and killing animals, in order to provide e.g. food and clothing.

How do they think that we can get a more peaceful and just world by inflicting completely unnecessary suffering, violence and death to sentient beings with an interest of not suffering and an interest of a continued existence? It is unnecessary, since they can provide nutritious foods for an optimal health from non-animal sources [1], and they can provide clothes created from non-animal sources.

Violence anywhere, hurts everyone, everywhere. A violent means, apart from being immoral, doesn’t work to reach a nonviolent ends.
As long as there as people think that violence can be justified for completely frivolous reasons, such as the violence in the production of animal foods, people will think that other forms of violence also are justified, that are much less frivolous.

A human rights-organization sees a need, e.g. a freezing child that is starving. They feed her/him animal foods and put on clothes from sheep wool. In this process animals are harmed, killed and exploited for completely frivolous reasons, frivolous since the starving and freezing child could have been fed by foods from non-animal sources, and clothed from non-animal sources. In the process of helping the kid, animals are exploited, people are taught to believe that violence is justified for frivolous reasons and that it can be used to help people; poverty and starvation is exacerbated because of all plants, water and energy required to feed the animal who is killed for frivolous reasons. People start wars, and use violence, for what they believe are justified reasons; because they have been taught that violence is a justified means (reinforced by having violence on their plates 3 times per day (violence that was used to produce animal foods), and using violence as their clothes everyday (violence that was used to kill and domesticate the animals used for fur, leather, down, etc.)) to reach a peaceful ends; and in this process poverty and starvation is exacerbated, which again human rights activists try to alleviate through being violent towards animals.  And thus this is all a vicious circle.

Se fortsättningen här: http://bloganders.blogspot.no/2013/11/human-rights-and-animal-rights-against.html