tisdag 16 oktober 2012

B12-vitamin from plants

Regarding B12, please consider this:
"One of the biggest issues plaguing vegans today, is the issue on Vitamin B12 (or the lack thereof) in a vegan diet. This is an issue that surfaces more and more in the media lately and [uninformed] people use this
as an excuse not to go vegan. They claim that if humans were meant to be total vegetarians, then why can B12 not be obtained from plants and only from meats. Such statements spread from ignorance and cause disinformation that often leads to heated debates. So what is the truth?

Without too long a penning, world experts today claim that B12 is needed for blood formation and cell division, but neither plants nor animals make it and that bacteria are responsible for producing this vitamin. With a little bit of effort and research, one can easily find independent, peer-reviewed rese
arch outcomes that confirm this claim.

So why then are there so many differing articles and “finds” on the matter. Well, simply because not all plants everywhere are exposed to this bacteria and the only way animals can “have” this vitamin, is if they have eaten something that contained this bacteria. This explains the various results of research conducted under different circumstances, places, etc.

Research also indicates that organically grown plants are a higher and more constant source of Vitamin B12 than fruits and veggies produced commercially. The same goes for animals, even though research has also shown that the commercial meat industry supplies zero B12 due to the animals NOT being exposed to this bacteria. This is nothing new, as this kind of research goes all the way back to 1926.

Therefore, the claim that B12 deficiency is evidence for humans to be omnivores have no foundation and holds no water. The B12 present in plants are totally reliant on how freely the micro fauna and –flora in the ground is allowed to flourish. When these microorganisms are killed off with herbicides and pesticides, the plants will contain very little or no B12." [Quote: Paul J Nel ]

Anders Branderud Re. animals proteins.
Our body is not designed for eating animals.
The Creator did not give us the right to take the life of our Creator's sentient beings with a soul; and He did NOT design us for this. Just because a person states this is in "holy boo
k", doen't mean it is true. I actually assumed this for 10+ years, but eventually I was willing to question my premise.

Some evidence re. how the body of the human is designed:
"Since we are primates, designed best for a plant predominant diet, many people have a limited capacity to digest animal proteins efficiently. When we eat a diet rich in animal protein, our ability to efficiently cleave all the amino acid bonds may be limited. All the protein may not be totally broken down into its amino acid building blocks. There is evidence that when animal peptides (pieces of partially broken-down proteins) are absorbed. They can lead to the formation of antibodies against themselves. Our immune system will not only attack these foreign proteins, but it can also cross-react, attacking human proteins in the body that resemble the amino acid sequences found on dietary animal proteins.

In other words, because animal proteins closely resemble the amino acid sequences of human body proteins, our own reaction (antibodies) against inadequately broken down proteins (peptides) can also attack our own tissues. Plant proteins are less likely to cause this reaction, even if their peptides pass into the bloodstream, because they bear little resemblance to human proteins. Because we cannot efficiently dissolve animal proteins in the digestive tract and, frequently, consumption exceeds the digestive capacity, more incompletely digested peptides are apt to be absorbed. These peptides also results in the stimulation of unhealthy bacterial flora and the absorption of toxic bacterial by-products, which can create an inflammatory environment and, hence, immune dysfunction." [Quote: http://www.drfuhrman.com/disease/arthritis.aspx ]

Animal proteins vs eating vegan, will of God/Creator

Re. animals proteins.
Our body is not designed for eating animals.
The Creator did not give us the right to take the life of our Creator's sentient beings with a soul; and He did NOT design us for this. Just because a person states this is in "holy boo
k", doen't mean it is true. I actually assumed this for 10+ years, but eventually I was willing to question my premise.

Some evidence re. how the body of the human is designed:
"Since we are primates, designed best for a plant predominant diet, many people have a limited capacity to digest animal proteins efficiently. When we eat a diet rich in animal protein, our ability to efficiently cleave all the amino acid bonds may be limited. All the protein may not be totally broken down into its amino acid building blocks. There is evidence that when animal peptides (pieces of partially broken-down proteins) are absorbed. They can lead to the formation of antibodies against themselves. Our immune system will not only attack these foreign proteins, but it can also cross-react, attacking human proteins in the body that resemble the amino acid sequences found on dietary animal proteins.

In other words, because animal proteins closely resemble the amino acid sequences of human body proteins, our own reaction (antibodies) against inadequately broken down proteins (peptides) can also attack our own tissues. Plant proteins are less likely to cause this reaction, even if their peptides pass into the bloodstream, because they bear little resemblance to human proteins. Because we cannot efficiently dissolve animal proteins in the digestive tract and, frequently, consumption exceeds the digestive capacity, more incompletely digested peptides are apt to be absorbed. These peptides also results in the stimulation of unhealthy bacterial flora and the absorption of toxic bacterial by-products, which can create an inflammatory environment and, hence, immune dysfunction." [Quote: http://www.drfuhrman.com/disease/arthritis.aspx ]

lördag 13 oktober 2012

Truth, Torah, not to lie, not steal, love of His creation

My reply to a friend:
I hope you are doing well!

I am still pursuing to find and to do the Will of our Creator [with all capabilities that I am given, including intellect]; and in my pursuit I found a multitude of redactions of the Torah and also practises which I don't think reflect the Will of our Creator:
like claimed mass-killings of Kanaanites and the great amount of killings (including sacrifices) of our Creators other sapient creations - His beloved animals.

I am continuing to follow principles in the Torah that I regard to be in accordance with the Will of the Creator:
not lieing, not stealing, and other harmful practises that harm the creation of our Creator - people, animals and environment.
I am also continuing doing what benefits His creation, including loving His creation.

What are your thoughts about this; and what are you learning?

Take care!
Have a wonderful day!
Send my love to everyone!


Learn more in my other blog posts, including documentation of redactions.

tisdag 9 oktober 2012

Errors in the history account of the Bible, Joshua, wars...

Other than the contradictions that Paul already has pointed out in the Torah, there are a multitude of other errors, contradictions and later redactions.

Here is one example:
"Also archaeological evidence contradicts the picture in Joshua. In the Ancient Near East, destroyed cities tended to be leveled, and then a new city would just be built on top of the ruins, and you would have these slowly rising mounds — each one of those is called a tell (so you may have heard of Tell Dor?). These are mounds which represent the successive layers of destroyed and rebuilt cities. And excavations will reveal the destruction layers under the floor of new cities. So following the biblical account, we would expect evidence of a thirteenth century destruction of Canaanite cities. And archaeologists for a long time were convinced that they would find these destruction layers. But they were disappointed. They have found really no evidence of extensive conquest and destruction in thirteenth and twelfth century archaeological layers. Some of the sites that are said to be destroyed by Joshua and the Israelites weren't even occupied in this period, the late Bronze Age, beginning of the Iron Age; the Iron Age begins around 1200. Excavations at Jericho and Ai indicate that both of these towns were laid waste at least 200 years before the probable time of Joshua; so there weren't even any walls in Jericho at the time of Joshua. Of 20 identifiable sites that were said to be conquered or captured by Joshua and the next generations, only two show destruction layers for this time, Hazor and Beth-el. And yet interestingly enough, Hazor's capture described in Joshua is contradicted elsewhere in the Bible, because in Judges 4 and 5, it is still a Canaanite city. It is said there that it is still a Canaanite city and Joshua failed to take it."
[Source: http://oyc.yale.edu/religious-studies/rlst-145/lecture-12 ]

Changes in Torah, errors of Abrahimic religions, Genesis 1 vs Genesis 9

  •  Quote Paul Nel:
    Just in the last 2000 years alone the TaNaKH has been changed many times by interpreters choosing their own interpretations to suit their own agendas.
    And so we have discussions. One cannot state all the obvious in one go - that would take a whole website on its own (and as far as I am aware, none such exists presently. It is a matter of searching and searching and searching, like growing. There is no "one click gets it all" solution.
    Each person here is on a different place on this journey of discovering the truth. And so it must remain. People help each other up when they fall, but they don't force others to be at the same mountain top or valley as they are, for such would cause the other person to miss out on they journey - and the journey is as important as the end. Each person must travel this road at his/her own pace, for it is his/her journey. No one else can walk it for you.

    Read through the posts and you will find lots of information on the matter.
    There are both intentional- and unintentional errors. Unintentional errors would include errors due to poor sight or tired eyes. Reasons for intentional changes would include political or doctrinal agendas. these are the dangerous ones.
    As an example, and very relevant to this group, would be the original diet given by the Creator to His creation at the end of Bereshith 1. And then, as if He had a change of mind, "He" adjusts this diet in Bereshith 9.
    Now, The ONE constant among ALL the Abrahamic religions is that the Creator changes not. He is omniscient and He saw that all He created was tov (good). We cannot have it both ways. Either we must accept then that He did indeed find fault with His creation and original diet and so changed it to incorporate the killing and eating of His other creations, which would mean that the writings is true, OR, we can accept that He never changes, that indeed His creation was perfect, that indeed He is omniscient and do not make mistakes, which means that the writings were redacted.

Torah, errors, MTT and DSS

I was fundamentally believing Torah to be without errors re. its commandments for the last 11 years - first as a devout Christian for six years. 2007 I started doing my best to keep the commandments of the Books of Moses and rejected Christianity. For a while (and until recently) I had beliefs very similar to the Karaites.
Later on I have started to study more information that scrutinizes what I did believe.

Some of what I have learned recently:
The whole concept that the non-dimensional Creator, who is non-physical, would require/need any physical sacrifice is a concept that some Israelites borrowed from pagan polytheistic religions.
The Creator has NOT commanded us/given us the right to kill any sapient beings, including animals, which He created. The Creator wants us to take care of and love all of His sapients being.

Why would anyone ever assume (as many religious texts do) that the Creator created life and wants man to kill what He has created?

Mikey wrote: "How has it been changed? "
The research on which these Yale University-lectures are based on, is evidence of many errors, contradictions and late redactions of the Torah:
http://oyc.yale.edu/religious-studies/rlst-145/

That MT and DSS are similar doesn't prove anything. The redactions of the Torah took place before this.
The Bible-text itself contains many contradictions.

söndag 7 oktober 2012

Torah, killing animals?, vegetarian, Genesis 9, Leviticus 11

My post to a friend:
Hej Sophie!
Thank you for your information and for advocating not to killing animals!!

How are you doing?

You asked me last week if I believed that Torah is the Instructions from our Creator.
I think that parts are in accordance with the Will of our Creator and parts are not.
E.g. I agree with Genesis 1 that reflects that man should only eat plants. I don't agree with Genesis 9, Leviticus 11, etc, that man has permission to slaughter and eat animals...
The Creator gave the animals a nephesh --- not for us to take their lifes. Rather, we should take care of them.

What are your thoughts?

If you think that I am wrong about my new position about Torah, then please study the arguments and prove me wrong. I certainly am doing my best to find the truth about our Creator and what He wants for us.
I can't believe in and follow something (e.g. Torah), which I found many errors in. [This is what I am studying now: http://oyc.yale.edu/religious-studies/rlst-145 - referring to what scholarship is claiming about the Bible. It is not only about the Israelite celebration, but it covers the totality of the Bible - e.g. the accounts of the claimed Israelite invasion of Kanaan. It consists of a lecture series of 18 lectures at Yale university based lots of research by various scholars [including Jewish].]

I will of course stay your friend regardless of what you believe!
I am just trying to be helpful; and I am also sure that you are doing the same!

Take care my friend!!!