You can't prove that it is justifiable to kill animals, or that it is "natural" for us to kill animals.
Killing and hurting animals contradicts the basic intuition that humans are born with.
We
 have the ability to develop love and compassion for all beings. But it 
requires that we stop oppressing them. We can intuitively know that it 
is wrong to cause suffering and to kill another sentient being. However,
 if we oppress animals routinely as most humans do, we may lose this 
capacity. Just like persons committing severe moral atrocities may not 
have comprehended that what they did was morally wrong. I believe that 
men are goodhearted. However, humans participating in regularly 
excluding the animals, regularly saying 'I don't care' by the choices 
made, regularly oppressing them by eating them, wearing them and making 
other choices that are oppressing the animals, may become very 
disconnected to the animals, their lives and their inherent moral value.
One can reason like this:
"1.
 The imposition of suffering on any sentient being requires an adequate 
moral justification and pleasure, amusement, or convenience cannot 
suffice as adequate to justify imposing suffering on any sentient being
2. The most “humane” animal agriculture involves considerable suffering imposed on sentient beings
3. As a general matter, our best (and only) justification for eating animal products is pleasure, amusement, or convenience
4. Therefore: We cannot morally justify eating animal products
 
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar